One week is short but usable. Triage what to learn, retrieve instead of rereading, spread each topic over a few days, and know what cramming cannot do for you.
By Bleart Emini, founder · Published · Last reviewed · 7 min read
With one week left, you cannot learn a whole course, so you have to choose. Sort the material by how much it is worth and how much of it you already know, spend your best hours on the middle of that sort, and test yourself instead of rereading. Spread each topic across at least two or three days rather than one long sitting. That is the whole plan. The rest of this article is how to run it, and what to expect from it.
I crammed for the AP Psychology exam in about a week, mostly vocabulary. On weekdays I studied at least an hour a day with flashcards and recall, and I ended with a practice test. I am not claiming how it turned out. I am describing what I did.
Be honest at the start. A week can get you from "I recognize some of this" to "I can produce the main definitions, procedures and examples without looking". It cannot give you the deep fluency that comes from months of use, and it will not rescue a course where you never learned the basic ideas.
Cramming also has a known cost. Material learned in one burst tends to fade faster than material studied across sessions. Kornell (2009) found that spacing beat cramming, and, more uncomfortably, that most participants felt like massing had worked better. If you are cramming anyway, the goal is to make it less of a cram: break the week into small repeated passes instead of one long pass.
So the realistic aim is to maximize the material you can retrieve on exam day, and to accept that some of it will not last past the weekend.
Before you study anything, list every topic the final covers. Use the syllabus, the study guide, past quizzes and, if the teacher allows it, a practice test. For each topic, give it two ratings from 1 to 3: how much it is worth on the exam, and how well you know it right now.
Then sort:
Skipping something on purpose feels bad. It is still better than spending a third of the week on a topic worth 3 percent of the grade.
Adjust the days to your exam date. The structure is what matters.
Days 1 and 2: first pass on the high-value topics. Learn or relearn each topic in short blocks of 25 to 45 minutes with breaks. After each block, close the notes and write or say everything you remember. Then check, and put what you missed into a deck of flashcards or a list of questions.
Day 3: second pass, from memory. Go back to the topics from day 1 and test yourself before you look at anything. This gap of two days is small, but it is a gap, and the retrieval after forgetting a bit is where the benefit comes from.
Day 4: the medium topics. Same method as days 1 and 2, but faster. Make your cards or questions as you go.
Day 5: mixed practice. Take a practice test or old quiz questions with no notes, under time if the exam is timed. Mark each miss as "did not know it" or "knew it but could not use it". The first goes back to cards. The second goes to worked problems or practice writing.
Day 6: weakest material only. Use your miss list from day 5. Review in short rounds, and finish with a run through every card you have missed twice.
Day 7, the day before or the morning of: light and short. One quick pass over your list of recurring errors. No new topics. Sleep matters more than another hour of cards.
If the exam is in fewer than seven days, merge days. If it is in more, add a second mixed practice test.
I will use AP Psychology because it is the vocabulary-heavy course I crammed for.
Here is an example of how to apply the plan, not a record of what I did. Say the diagnostic shows you confuse terms that sound alike: proactive interference and retroactive interference, or classical conditioning and operant conditioning.
A weak card says: "Proactive interference: definition?" You will recognize the definition and move on. A stronger set uses contrast and application:
In this setup, the work on day 1 is writing cards that force you to tell similar terms apart, and the work on day 3 is answering them cold. By day 5, a practice test tells you whether the vocabulary transfers to unfamiliar scenario questions. Writing the cards well takes real time, so budget for it, and see the guide on writing good flashcards.
Spacing beats cramming, but the studies are narrow. Kornell (2009) ran three experiments in which participants used a web-based programme to learn GRE-type word pairs. Studying one large stack of flashcards beat studying four smaller stacks separately, and spacing beat massing study on the last day before the test. Spacing was better for 90 percent of participants, yet after the first study session 72 percent thought massing had been better. Caveats: the study is about vocabulary-like pairs in a lab-style setting, and the figures here come from its abstract.
Gaps should match the delay to the test. Cepeda and colleagues (2006) pooled 839 assessments from 317 experiments in 184 articles on verbal recall. The interval between study sessions that gave the best retention grew as the delay to the test grew. For a one-week plan, that points to gaps of a day or two between passes, not weeks. Caveat: the paper is about verbal material, and this article does not turn it into an exact schedule.
Testing yourself helps more than restudying, at delays beyond a few minutes. Roediger and Karpicke (2006) had students study prose passages and either restudy or take free-recall tests with no feedback. At a five-minute delay restudying did better. At two days and one week, tested students remembered substantially more, even though restudying made them feel more sure. That is directly relevant to a one-week plan. Caveat: passages of prose, with a longest delay of one week, so it does not tell you about long-term retention after a final.
Rereading and highlighting rate low. Dunlosky and colleagues (2013) reviewed ten techniques and rated practice testing and distributed practice as the most useful. Rereading, highlighting and summarization rated low. The authors caution that no technique is a cure for every student. This description rests on the abstract and the summary from the Association for Psychological Science.
No study was found that tests a seven-day plan like this one against other seven-day plans. The structure here is an adaptation of the findings above, not a tested protocol.
All study articles · Features · Sign up
Features · Pricing · Explore public decks · Student discount · Study guides · Study articles · Help · Sign up · Log in · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service
Cardvoo runs in your browser and needs JavaScript turned on.